Newest papers

On Bonart's interpretation of the Square-Root Impact Law

J. -P. Bouchaud, Iacopo Mastromatteo, B. Toth · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10053 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

French

La loi de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de l'impact de

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

The square-root impact law (SRIL), $I = Yσ\sqrt{Q/V}$, bundles two facts that a single mechanism must explain at once: a shape (impact proportional to square-root of traded volume $Q$) and an amplitude ($Y=O(1)$, independent of the participation rate $φ$). Bonart has recently proposed an elegant solution: if realized and counterfactual prices are both diffusive, information-neutral impact must have white increments and the SRIL follows without the wart. We reformulate and simplify his argument, and foreground the ingredient he himself regards as essential --- that the market whitens the stationary stream of each participant's metaorders, not any isolated one. The Lillo--Mike--Farmer model satisfies his premises, yet gives an isolated metaorder the super-square-root impact $φ^{(1-γ)/2}Q^{(1+γ)/2}$, $γ\in(0,1)$, because single metaorders (i.e. not part of a stream) are statistically invisible and thus priced mechanically. We then construct an explicit multi-agent propagator that realizes Bonart's whitening, and show it reproduces the clean SRIL precisely when the market can attribute trades to their issuer. But correct re-attribution of anonymous trades is a formidable task, which requires markets to behave as implausibly efficient signal processing machines. The stream hypothesis makes a sharp, falsifiable prediction --- isolated metaorders, well separated in time, should not obey the SRIL --- that does not seem agree with empirical data known to us. Independently, a volume-conservation argument singles out the square-root law and lays bare the step the diffusivity route must assume: diffusivity fixes the variance of impact --- an additive, stationary, age-blind quantity --- whereas the SRIL is a law for the mean impact, which marginally decays as $1/\sqrt{\text{age}}$ and therefore demands an origin of time.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Counterfactual thinking, Economics, Variance (accounting), Argument (complex analysis), Interpretation (philosophy), Econometrics

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.10053, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange