Newest papers

Which Text Matters: Handling Model Uncertainty in Text-as-Data Regressions, with an Application to Central Bank Communication

Martin Feldkircher, Bernd Prostmaier, Paul Hofmarcher, Pierre Siklos · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19720 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

French

Les scientifiques sociaux convertissent régulièrement le texte en covariations telles que les parts de sujet, les points idéaux ou les scores de sentiment, et les insèrent dans des modèles statistiques d'intérêt. Cette conception en deux étapes est pratique, mais elle est rarement guidée par la théorie: peu dit à l'analyste quelles covariations basées sur le texte à construire ou à inclure. Chaque approche incarne des choix de mesure contestés, et des opérations concurrentielles de la même construction peuvent soutenir des conclusions différentes, de sorte qu'une seule question de recherche donne naissance à un menu de modèles de régression concurrentiels. Quels sont les covariations de texte construites appartenant à un modèle, et dans quelle forme fonctionnelle, est donc un problème d'incertitude

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Social scientists routinely convert text into covariates like topic shares, ideal points or sentiment scores, and insert them into statistical models of interest. This two-step design is convenient, but it is rarely guided by theory: little tells the analyst which text-based covariates to construct or include. Each approach embodies contestable measurement choices, and competing operationalizations of the same construct can support different conclusions, so a single research question gives rise to a menu of competing regression models. Which text constructed covariates belong in a model, and in what functional form, is thus a problem of model uncertainty. We propose spike-and-slab generalized additive models (SSGAMs), which jointly select covariates and determine whether their effects are linear or nonlinear. We illustrate the approach with the communication of a powerful unelected institution, asking which of 45 competing text indicators from 224 monthly European Central Bank press conferences, spanning late 2002 to mid-2025, track professional inflation expectations. A sparse set is selected; widely used alternatives, and every tested nonlinear effect, carry no incremental information.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Covariate, Construct (python library), Computer science, Set (abstract data type), Econometrics, Ideal (ethics)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.19720, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange