Newest papers

CADS: Measuring the Incremental Contribution of LLM Proposers in Sequential Biological Screens

Guanxing Chen, Nihui Shao, Haohuai He, Zhenchao Tang, Pengwei Hu, Zhi-An Huang · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24597 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Chinese

大型语言间隔模型越来越多地被用来指导连续的生物屏幕,但标准评估依赖于原始打击计数,将提议者的价值与底层算法的发现能力相混淆。适应性采样和受损的实验读数也越来越多地使用来指导连续的生物屏幕,但我们提供认证代理发现屏幕(CADS),这是一个错误控制的测量框架,该框架将提议者的增量值量化为相同的LLM-free loop。通过整合封闭的概率比线、电子流程和完整的e-BH,CADS在状态为零和腐败条件下的认证终端发现率控制,尽管任意分辨率,适应性采样和选择性停止反馈。在Mapback模拟中,CADS通过对应的

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly used to guide sequential biological screens, yet standard evaluations rely on raw hit counts that conflate a proposer's value with the discovery capacity of the underlying algorithmic harness. Adaptive sampling and corrupted experimental readouts also leave standard feedback comparisons without a false-discovery guarantee. We present Certified Agentic Discovery Screens (CADS), an error-controlled measurement framework that quantifies a proposer's incremental value against an identical LLM-free loop. By integrating capped likelihood-ratio bounds, e-processes, and complete-family e-BH, CADS controls the terminal false discovery rate under the stated null and corruption conditions despite arbitrary dependence, adaptive sampling, and optional stopping. In DepMap-backed simulations, CADS exposes two evaluation artifacts: the LLM-free harness alone clears the feedback gate, and raw origin counts overstate LLM contributions because LLM picks displace fallback discoveries. On the initial 20 seeds, supplying tested-candidate history to Qwen2.5-7B shifts its net contribution from +0.35, with a 95% interval covering zero, to +2.90, with the interval above zero. This initial net effect did not persist in a 50-seed matched-quota replication. These results support net gain over an LLM-free loop, measured between separately certified sets, as the appropriate measure of proposer contribution.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Measure (data warehouse), Interval (graph theory), Value (mathematics), Conflation, Certification

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.24597, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange