Basile Schlosser, Jérémy Thibault, Cătălin Hriţcu · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26054 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF
Les garanties de sécurité des compilateurs officiellement vérifiés existants pour les programmes compartimentés dans des langages non sécurisés tels que C s'arrêtent à un niveau assez élevé, en supposant un mécanisme de protection intégré et un modèle de mémoire basé sur bloc. Vérifier un mécanisme d'exécution concret de bas niveau pour l'isolation du compartiment est toujours un défi majeur pour les techniques de preuve actuelles. En particulier, la technique de preuve d'Abate et al. échoue parce que l'une de leurs étapes de preuve, la recomposition, nécessite essentiellement de cacher toutes les informations sur le code de chaque compartiment, ce qui n'est pas pratiquement réalisable à un niveau bas. Nous proposons une extension de leur technique de preuve à un niveau bas
Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.
The security guarantees of existing formally verified compilers for compartmentalized programs in unsafe languages like C stop at a rather high level, assuming a built-in protection mechanism and a block-based memory model. Verifying a concrete, low-level enforcement mechanism for compartment isolation is still a major challenge for current proof techniques. In particular, Abate et al.'s proof technique fails because one of their proof steps, recomposition, essentially requires hiding all information about the code of each compartment, which is not practically achievable at a low level. We propose an extension of their proof technique to a low-level setting where compartments can fully observe each other's code. To do so, we introduce an overlay semantics that allows us to characterize these observations as a form of undefined behaviour, and we use a novel variant of recomposition that we call blame-aware recomposition, which essentially allows recomposing executions as needed in the original high-level proof technique, even if the low-level context observes the code, because this context is ultimately going to be discarded. We apply this new proof to a compartment isolation mechanism that uses a programmable tag-based reference monitor.
Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese
Topics: Mathematical proof, Computer science, Context (archaeology), Isolation (microbiology), Operational semantics, Programming language
GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.26054, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txtSources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange