Newest papers

Intra-Rubric Reward Divergence: Mitigating Rubric Hacking through Latent Dimension Recovery and Balancing

Jianqiang Xia, Han Xu, Dianxi Shi · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26685 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Indonesian

Dengan memecah rubrik menjadi sub-dimensi, kami mengungkapkan Intra-Rubric Reward Divergence: ketika total skor rubrik meningkat, skor sub-dimensi tertentu secara sistematis menurun, menunjukkan bahwa model mengorbankan aspek kualitas tertentu untuk mengoptimalkan tujuan agregasi. Dari sudut pandang sub-dimensi, kami mengamati dua fenomena: (1) ketidakseimbangan dimensi, menyebabkan kebijakan untuk mendukung dimensi yang sangat tercakup; (2) ketidakhadiran dimensi, yang mengarah pada kesenjangan sistematis antara penghargaan dan kualitas sejati. Untuk meringankan masalah ini, kami mengusulkan Fair-Race Dimension Aggregation (DA), yang memiliki generasi bersaing dalam setiap dimensi secara terpisah untuk meringankan ketidakseimbangan rubric, dan Residual Semantic Dimension Completion (RSRS), yang mengindikasikan

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Rubric hacking limits both performance and training robustness in rubric-based reinforcement learning. By decomposing rubrics into sub-dimensions, we reveal the Intra-Rubric Reward Divergence: as the total rubric score increases, certain sub-dimension scores systematically decrease, suggesting the model sacrifices specific quality aspects to optimize the aggregated objective. From the sub-dimension perspective, we observe two phenomena: (1) dimension imbalance, causing the policy to favor heavily covered dimensions; (2) dimension absence, leading to a systematic gap between rewards and true quality. To mitigate these issues, we propose Fair-Race Dimension Aggregation (FRDA), which has generations compete within each dimension separately to mitigate rubric imbalance, and Residual Semantic Dimension Completion (RSDC), which mines evaluation dimensions implicitly encoded in a holistic preference signal to complete rubric coverage. Experiments in chat, science, and medical domains indicate that FRDA mitigates rubric hacking with more stable improvements, while RSDC outperforms both single-reward training and naive multi-reward aggregation, yielding generally higher-quality responses.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Rubric, Dimension (graph theory), Robustness (evolution), Computer science, Hacker, Artificial intelligence

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.26685, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange