Newest papers

EMBER: Predicting TCR--pMHC Binding Without a Docked Complex

Lin Ha, Chen Zhou, Haozheng Luo, Han Liu, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yan Chen · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27334 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Spanish

Proponemos EMBER, un marco basado en la estructura para la predicción de la vinculación TCR-pMHC que elimina la necesidad de un complejo predicado, y con ello el error de posicionamiento que domina tales predicciones. Los predictores tradicionales basados en la estructura utilizan la estructura compleja co-foldada del receptor y el antígeno e interpretan la vinculación de su superficie de contacto. Por lo tanto, cada característica a continuación hereda cualquier desviación de la herramienta de predicción de la estructura introducida. Metodológicamente, EMBER dobla el TCR y el pMHC de forma independiente, los codifica como gráficos de residuos SE(3) invariantes, y compara sus representaciones aprendidas sin construir un marco compartido de coordenadas. Por lo tanto, una posición relativa no es una entrada del modelo, por

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

We propose EMBER, a structure-based framework for TCR--pMHC binding prediction that eliminates the need for a predicted docked complex, and with it the placement error that dominates such predictions. Traditional structure-based predictors utilize the co-folded complex structure of the receptor and the antigen and interpret binding from its contact surface. Consequently, every downstream feature inherits any deviation the structure-prediction tool introduced. Methodologically, EMBER folds the TCR and pMHC independently, encodes them as SE(3)-invariant residue graphs, and compares their learned representations without constructing a shared coordinate frame. A relative pose is therefore not an input of the model, so placement error cannot propagate into the prediction. Computationally, EMBER preprocesses $O(N{+}M)$ monomer folds where a complex-based predictor needs $O(NM)$ operations. Experimentally, under epitope-disjoint evaluation with six retrained baselines, EMBER is first on every metric under all four folding tools, by 0.9 to 14.4% in micro-AUROC, 18.5 to 25.3% in micro-AUPRC and 10.6 to 24.1% in MCC. Its ranking is also up to 85% more stable across folding tools.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Metric (unit), Set (abstract data type), Folding (DSP implementation), Algorithm, Artificial intelligence

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.27334, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange