Vasisht Duddu, Adam Caulfield, Xi He · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27543 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF
Os regulamentos exigem que as empresas executem modelos de inteligência artificial em uma caixa de areia regulatória, um ambiente isolado que permite monitorar o comportamento do modelo por reguladores, antes da implantação. Mas, eles não escrevem os mecanismos técnicos para projetar tal caixa de areia. Idealmente, uma caixa de areia regulatória deve mostrar (i) conformidade (checks contra regulamentos, e desvios de evidência do comportamento pretendido, ou seja, ferramentas e chamadas de sistema não autorizadas); (ii) confidencialidade (protege os pesos de modelo devido aos reguladores); (iii) atestabilidade de execução (produz evidências de comportamento do modelo resistente a tampões para monitoramento); e (iv) escalabilidade (evidência é verificável por vários reguladores). Vários trabalhos prévios (controle de fluxo
Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.
Regulations require companies to run AI models in a regulatory sandbox, an isolated environment that enables monitoring model behavior by regulators, prior to deployment. But, they do not spell out the technical mechanisms to design such a sandbox. Ideally, a regulatory sandbox should show (i) compliance (checks against regulations, and deviations from intended behavior, i.e., unauthorized tool and system calls); (ii) confidentiality (protects model weights from regulators); (iii) attestability (produces tamper-resistant evidence of model behavior for monitoring); and (iv) scalability (evidence is verifiable by multiple regulators). Several prior works (information-flow control, prompt-injection defenses, control-flow integrity, and traditional sandboxing) address specific compliance aspects but lack confidentiality, attestability, and scalability. TEEs meet some of these requirements, but simply running models inside a TEE is insufficient as we need compliance mechanisms. We present KNOX, the first regulatory sandbox, built by running AI workloads inside TEEs. We demonstrate KNOX using agentic workloads. For compliance, we derive an attested policy manifest (with the applicable regulations, the expected tool calls, and the permitted system calls) for a given user prompt. Before an executor performs an action, an attested reference monitor compares it against the attested policy manifest and allows it only if it matches. Every action and verdict is recorded in an attested execution graph, enabling regulators to verify the model's execution and its compliance. We show that KNOX meets all requirements, and can check for compliance with regulations and deviations from intended behavior (e.g., due to prompt injection); and incurs low overhead (<1%).
Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese
Topics: Sandbox (software development), Computer science, Executor, Scalability, Overhead (engineering), Computer security
GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.27543, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txtSources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange