Tingxu Han, Wei Song, Ziming Li, Yuchen Chen, Weisong Sun, Zhenpeng Chen, Chunrong Fang, Zhenyu Chen, Yang Liu · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27634 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF
La generación automática de documentación de alta calidad para repositorios de software sigue siendo un desafío: los enfoques existentes tratan la documentación en gran medida como generación de texto sin restricciones, carecen de especificaciones relativas de calidad explícitas, dependiendo en gran medida de prompts de contexto largo sobre código crudo, y ofrecen un apoyo limitado para la evaluación reproducible. Argumentamos que la generación de documentación a nivel de código debe ser en cambio una tarea de ingeniería de software guiada por estándares, en la que la documentación es generada y evaluada contra requisitos de calidad explícitos y reutilizables derivados de estándares autorizados. Definimos la documentación de código como descripciones en lengua natural de funciones y clases de repositorio, organizadas por el camino del código fuente. Presentamos CODOCED, un marco de estudio orientado
Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.
Automatically generating high-quality documentation for software repositories remains challenging: existing approaches largely treat documentation as unconstrained text generation, lacking explicit quality specifications, depending heavily on long-context prompts over raw code, and offering limited support for reproducible evaluation. We argue that code-level documentation generation should instead be a standards-guided software engineering task, in which documentation is generated and assessed against explicit, reusable quality requirements derived from authoritative standards. We define code documentation as natural-language descriptions of repository functions and classes, organized by source-code path. We present CODEDOC, a standards-guided and dependency-aware framework that identifies dependencies between code entities via static call-graph and AST analysis and constructs dependency-aware structured prompts combining local code context, repository paths, and documentation criteria drawn from authoritative standards and style guides. We further introduce an interactive LLM-as-a-judge protocol that supplies criterion-aligned feedback to refine generated documentation along fine-grained dimensions from formal and practice-oriented standards. Experiments on ten open-source Python repositories show that CODEDOC produces higher-quality documentation than RepoAgent and a long-context baseline under standards-aligned evaluation, with relative improvements of 11.6%-17.0% and 21.4%-29.6%, respectively, while consuming roughly an order of magnitude fewer tokens per documentation entity than the long-context baseline. A human study confirms substantial alignment between LLM-based and human judgments (Spearman's rho = 0.72), and the relative findings hold across different judge LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/ControllableModel/CodeDoc.
Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese
Topics: Documentation, Software documentation, Internal documentation, Computer science, Technical documentation, Software engineering
GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.27634, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txtSources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange