Newest papers

Anytime-Valid Runtime Monitoring of Learned Barrier Certificates

Zhipeng Cao, Taoran Wu, Weiru Cui, Luke Ong, Bai Xue · 2026 · Preprints.org

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202610.2093.v1 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Portuguese

Os certificados de barreira aprendidos fornecem um mecanismo de dados de princípio para estabelecer a segurança dos sistemas estocásticos, mas sua validade pode deteriorar durante a implantação quando a dinâmica subjacente difere daqueles usados para o treinamento. Propomos um monitor de tempo de execução válido a qualquer momento que audita um certificado de barreira aprendido usando trajetórias de ciclo fechado observadas. O monitor destina-se a detectar a perda de suporte estatístico para a condição de barreira implantada; ele não garante por si mesmo a detecção antes da entrada insegura ou a segurança de uma intervenção subsequente. Especificamente, a condição de barreira condicional-drift é formulada como um teste de hipótese seqüencial episódica, e os incrementos de barreira observados são transformados em um

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Learned barrier certificates provide a principled mechanism for establishing safety of stochastic systems, but their validity may deteriorate during deployment when the underlying dynamics differ from those used for training. We propose an anytime-valid runtime monitor that audits a learned barrier certificate using observed closed-loop trajectories. The monitor is intended to detect loss of statistical support for the deployed barrier condition; it does not by itself guarantee detection before unsafe entry or safety of a subsequent intervention. Specifically, the conditional barrier-drift condition is formulated as an episode-wise sequential hypothesis test, and observed barrier increments are transformed into a nonnegative test supermartingale, yielding finite-sample false-alarm control under arbitrary stopping times. Inspired by finite-horizon safety verification, we further introduce a deterministic temporal shaping of the monitoring boundary, making the monitor more conservative early in a prescribed deployment horizon while preserving anytime-validity. The monitor is designed to detect statistical evidence that the safety certificate is no longer consistent with the observed dynamics, rather than to predict unsafe entry. To assess the monitor empirically, we evaluate empirical alarm behavior under valid and invalid certificates. Code and data are available at https://github.com/FormalCert-AI/runtime-barrier-monitor.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Certificate, Computer science, Software deployment, ALARM, Audit, Control (management)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.27726, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange