Newest papers

Poisoning-Based Backdoors Are Not Cryptographic

Masahiro Kaneko · 2026 · arXiv

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2610.28045 · open-access PDF

Chinese

为了防御神经网络的后门攻击,防御者必须识别确定输入是否是触发器的验证函数,而不是孤立地拒绝个别触发器,因为攻击者可以更快地生成满足同一个验证器的新的触发器,而不是阻止它们。

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

To defend against backdoor attacks on neural networks, the defender must identify the verifier function that determines whether an input is a trigger, rather than rejecting individual triggers in isolation, since an attacker can generate new triggers satisfying the same verifier faster than they can be blocked. If a backdoor verifier could be installed with the asymmetry of a cryptographic authentication scheme, in which only the attacker can produce trigger inputs while the defender cannot reverse-engineer the verifier from observations, learning-based defense would be impossible in principle

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.28045, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange