Newest papers

ExeBench-FHD: Addressing Fidelity Issues in Decompiler Evaluation

Akarsh Ashok, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Vivek Balachandran · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28212 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Chinese

ExeBench是最常用的数据基准之一,用于评估基于LLM的解调器。我们分析了ExeBench,并识别了九个问题,影响了测试混合器如何忠实地测量解调器。其中三个阻止了LLM解调器从ExeBench的功能中恢复C代码。这些是对整数和浮点类型混合时的模糊的参数顺序,未使用的参数,优化组装可能会下降,并且存储在函数组装代码外的常数。另外六个影响了测试有效性:没有返回的非空函数,位置持有人类型,优化器删除的静态或线性函数,函数被称为主体,试验体和断片定义。我们介绍了ExeBench-FHD,

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

ExeBench is one of the most widely used benchmarks for evaluating LLM-based decompilers. We analyze ExeBench and identify nine issues that affect how faithfully a test measures a decompiler. Three of them prevent LLM decompilers from recovering C code from ExeBench's function. These are ambiguous parameter order when integer and floating-point types are mixed, unused parameters that optimized assembly may drop, and constants stored outside the function's assembly code. Six more affect test validity: non-void functions without a return, placeholder types, static or inline functions removed by the optimizer, functions named main, trivial bodies and truncated definitions. We present ExeBench-FHD, a backward-compatible revision of ExeBench that adds 16 new fields: call-site assembly, data sections, test wrappers, linked-binary disassembly and five warning flags. In ExeBench, 38.9% of functions have at least one of the five flags; dropping records with any of the four warning flags (all except unused_param, which marks functions that the new wrappers make evaluable) keeps 63.9% of the corpus. In an evaluation at -O2 on four architectures, the new fields raise GPT 6 Sol's re-execution rate by up to 26.5%, 19.1% and 21.0% on functions that read data sections, mix parameter types and have unused parameters, respectively.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Fidelity, Code (set theory), Test (biology), Integer (computer science), Order (exchange)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.28212, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange