Newest papers

When Thoughts Become Memory: Unifying In-Context Learning and Fine-Tuning

Leon Chlon, Julie Huang · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29419 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Korean

우리는이 카메라 네트워크 컨텍스트는 프레드 트레이닝 된 모델의 컨텍스트 또는 그 무게에 대한 보이지 않는 데이터가 프레드 트레이닝 된 모델의 컨텍스트에 속하는지 여부에 대한 인증 된 규칙을 제공하는 최초의 카메라 컨텍스트입니다. 그 값, 체크 아웃 쿼리에 저장된 코드 길이는 예상에 저장된 비트와 동등합니다. 모든 인증서는 훈련 된 변압기, TabPFN, 직무 네트워크, 스테레오 네트워크에 대한 디코딩 손실을 감소합니다. 법의 천장은 하나의 측정에서 선택을 인증하고, 언제든지 유효한 테스트는 체크 아웃 쿼리에서 훈련 된 것으로 만듭니다. 모든 인증서는 훈련 된 변

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

We are the first to give a certified rule for whether unseen data belong in a pretrained model's context or its weights, built on an exact law for their information value. That value, the code length saved on held-out queries, equals in expectation the bits stored about the query, plus a prior repair, minus a decoding loss, for any model, architecture, dataset and task. The law's ceilings certify the choice from one measurement, and an anytime-valid test makes it from held-out queries, with error controlled whenever it stops. Every certificate the ceilings issue on a trained transformer, TabPFN, an occupancy network and a stereo network is correct. The test picks TabPFN over XGBoost and a trained surrogate over an in-context learner on airfoil pressure, calls the better of GPT-2's cache and fine-tune in 61,948 of 64,000 query streams over 32 comparisons, and errs in at most 3.3% of null streams. The law also diagnoses when learning in context helps and when it does not. Deleting part of a context is held-out validation of that part in any model, and adding parts one at a time traces the learning curve in context: one patch that sees a shape feature cuts an occupancy network's code length there a hundredfold, while eight that miss it nearly double it, and one camera that sees the surface beats four in a stereo network. Ranked by this label-free valuation, a kriging learner's three best support cars beat four drawn at random, and on a yes-or-no claim the valuation recovers a published evidence adjudicator, with AUROC 0.91.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Certificate, Artificial intelligence, Context (archaeology), Code (set theory), Cache

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.29419, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange