Newest papers

Fragment-Level Graph Encoding for Interpretable Molecular Property Prediction

Rafael Lopes Almeida, Ina Pöhner · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29589 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Japanese

グラフ神経ネットワーク(GNNs)は、分子属性予測の標準ツールの1つですが、その予測の原子レベルの説明は、医薬品化学者が行動するために困難です。 我々は、新しいモデルの代わりに入力表示の変更を提案します:分子は、BRICS分解から分割レベルのグラフとして暗号化され、各ノードは合成的に有意義な断片であり、その特徴は、その原子の特徴の要素の合計である。 なぜならば、表示の変化は、メッセージを通過するGNNおよびすべてのポストホック属性付与方法は、単一の原子の代わりに機能グループの解像度で解釈を生成します。 4つのアーキテクチャを通して、4つの予

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are among the standard tools for molecular property prediction, but the atom-level explanations of their predictions are hard for medicinal chemists to act on. We propose a change of input representation rather than a new model: molecules are encoded as fragment-level graphs from BRICS decomposition, where each node is a synthetically meaningful fragment whose features are the element-wise sum of its atoms' features. Because only the representation changes, any message-passing GNN and any post-hoc attribution method produces explanations at the resolution of functional groups instead of single atoms. Across four architectures, four prediction tasks, and two explainers under scaffold splits, fragment-level encoding matches atom-level test accuracy on roughly five-fold smaller graphs. Integrated-Gradients attributions recover known pharmacophores above chance on two enzyme targets, namely BACE at 1.5 times the chance rate, and PTR1 at 3.2 times. A like-for-like comparison against an aggregated atom-level baseline shows that post-hoc aggregation is not a stable substitute: its BACE hit rate range both exceeds and falls below the fragment model's hit rate depending on two arbitrary aggregation choices, whereas fragment-level training yields a single convention-free attribution at no predictive cost. The code is available at: https://github.com/4D-Lab/frame

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Property (philosophy), Fragment (logic), Encoding (memory), Computer science, Representation (politics), Attribution

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.29589, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange