Newest papers

S-EDL: Eliciting Self-Evidence from Sequence Likelihoods for Semantic Calibration of LLMs

Yawei Li, Jiazheng Li, David Rügamer, Bernd Bischl, Yulan He, Mina Rezaei · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29832 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

German

Die Kalibrierung von großen Sprachmodellen (LLMs) in der Open-End-Generation ist einzigartig herausfordernd, weil viele verschiedene Token-Sequenzen die gleiche zugrunde liegende Bedeutung ausdrücken können. Vorherige Kalibrierungstechniken zielen entweder auf die feste Klassifizierungssicherheit oder die binäre Korrektheit einzelner Stränge ab, wodurch sie inhärent für die dynamische, multi-String-Natur der offenen terminalen semantischen Ergebnisse ungeeignet sind. Um diese Lücke zu überbrücken, führen wir S-EDL ein, eine neue Beweismethode, die LLMs für die semantische Kalibrierung nativ optimiert. Indem sie Beweise aus den Sequenzgleichheiten des Modells selbst hervorbringen, konstruiert S-ED

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Calibrating large language models (LLMs) in open-ended generation is uniquely challenging because many distinct token sequences can express the same underlying meaning. Prior calibration techniques target either fixed-set classification confidence or the binary correctness of individual strings, making them inherently ill-suited for the dynamic, multi-string nature of open-ended semantic outcomes. To bridge this gap, we introduce S-EDL, a novel evidential method that natively optimizes LLMs for semantic calibration. By eliciting evidence from the sequence likelihoods of the model itself, S-EDL constructs a differentiable Dirichlet prior over prompt-specific semantic classes. Optimizing the evidential loss under this prior yields a calibration-aware training signal over variable semantic classes, completely bypassing the need for fixed multiple-choice options. Evaluations across four open-ended benchmarks and three models demonstrate that S-EDL substantially reduces semantic calibration error while improving accuracy. By aligning generative likelihoods with semantic correctness, this work establishes a framework for deploying trustworthy LLMs in complex, open-ended applications. Code is available at: https://github.com/sandylaker/s-edl.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Correctness, Artificial intelligence, Calibration, Sequence (biology), Natural language processing

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.29832, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange