Newest papers

ExGrad: Beyond Suppression - Explicit Clean-Gradient Subtraction in Adversarial Training

Zhiyuan Ye, Xiangyu Zhou, Ji Qi, Hao Zhang, Yi Zhou · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.30018 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Korean

엑스그라드 (extrapolative gradient recomposition)는 CIFAR-10의 청소 입력, adversarial-input, 및 adversarial-weight-perturbed (AWP) gradients에서 업데이트를 생성하는 반대 방사선 훈련이지만, 소스 손실은 반대 방사선 상위에 업데이트의 효과를 직접적으로 특징화하지 않습니다. 우리는 ExGrad (extrapolative gradient clean control)를 소개합니다. CIFAR-10의 청소 입력, adversarial-input, 및 adversarial-weight-perturbed (AWP) gradients에서 부정적인 청소 요소가 급속하게 지배하고 방사선과 함께 규모를 증가합니다. 이 크로스 제로 개입은 광선 청소 요소를 0으로 설정하는 글로벌 솔루션이 불

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Adversarial training derives updates from surrogate losses, but source-loss descent does not directly characterize an update's effect on adversarial margins. We introduce ExGrad (extrapolative gradient recomposition), which constructs clean-input, adversarial-input, and adversarial-weight-perturbed (AWP) gradients. Virtual steps measure their margin responses, and a globally solvable three-variable problem selects coefficients over a bounded affine domain without nonnegativity constraints. Across affine radii on CIFAR-10, negative clean coefficients rapidly predominate and increase in magnitude with the radius. Cross-zero interventions show that setting the clean coefficient to zero is insufficient: mild subtraction improves PGD-20, while stronger subtraction trades clean accuracy for further PGD-20 gains. In CIFAR-10 WRN-28-4 controls, none of the three candidate-removal variants matches full ExGrad. Projection diagnostics show that negative clean coefficients usually coexist with positive net clean-axis projections, although both decrease as the radius grows. Norm-matched controls indicate that update magnitude alone does not explain the moderate-radius gains. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-100 show radius-dependent improvements over AWP. On CIFAR-100, ExGrad at $R=0.8$ improves all five reported metrics, including clean and AutoAttack accuracy by 3.84 and 1.75 percentage points. On ImageNet-100, the same radius improves all four robust metrics over both AWP and PGD-AT. These results identify clean-gradient subtraction as a response-revealed update preference whose strength and clean-robust operating point are controlled by the affine radius.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Background subtraction, Bounded function, Subtraction, Mathematics, Affine transformation, Measure (data warehouse)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.30018, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange