Newest papers

An Empirical Study of Recent Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph to Text Generation on Standard Benchmarks

Priyanka, Renaud Delbru, Souhail Bakkali, Mickaël Coustaty, Antoine Doucet · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31529 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Chinese

知识图表到文本(KG-to-text)生成将一组知识图表三倍化为流畅的自然语言。虽然精密调节的编码器和解码器模型长期以来一直是标准方法,但最近的LLM正在变得越来越有竞争力。我们将最近的LLM与精密调节的编码器和解码器模型进行比较,使用基于参考的指标和基于图表的基于参考的LLM评估进行验证,对人类注释进行了验证。我们观察到,最近的LLM在几个设置中显著狭窄,在基于参考的指标上与精密调节的模型之间的差距正在缩小,同时在基于图表的指标上表现更好。基于LLM的评估得分显示与基于参考的指标有限相关性

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Knowledge graph-to-text (KG-to-text) generation verbalizes a set of knowledge graph triples into fluent natural language. While fine-tuned encoder-decoder models have long been the standard approach, recent LLMs are becoming increasingly competitive. We benchmark recent LLMs against fine-tuned encoder-decoder models, using reference-based metrics and graph-grounded reference-free LLM-based evaluation validated against human annotations. We observed that recent LLMs substantially narrow, and in several settings close, the gap with fine-tuned models on reference-based metrics, while performing better on graph-grounded metrics. LLM-based evaluation scores show limited correlation with reference-based metrics, suggesting that the two approaches capture different aspects of generation quality. Graph-grounded evaluation reveals that prompted models produce fewer contradictions and triple omissions than fine-tuned models, and these errors increase more rapidly with graph size for fine-tuned models, highlighting differences between the two approaches that reference-based metrics may not fully capture.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Benchmark (surveying), Graph, Empirical research, Artificial intelligence, Set (abstract data type)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.31529, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange