Tianyu Xin, Wanqi Zhong, Bowen Hu, Zhangchi Guo, Lijie Wang, Yiming Wang, Haoran Liao, Heyang Yu · 2026 · arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2610.26564 · open-access PDF
World Action Models (WAMs) typically represent the world through latent embeddings from pretrained video models, which entangle heterogeneous aspects of the world, from how it looks (e.g., texture and color) to how it is physically configured (e.g., occupancy and pose). This raises an underexplored question: $\textbf{what should constitute the state of a WAM?}$ We argue that the world state should separate how the world appears from how the world evolves under action: the former captures semantic context, while the latter is governed by physical state. To this end, we propose $\textbf{PrismWAM
Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese
GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.26564, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txtSources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange