Newest papers

When Do LLMs Help with Feature Selection? A Systematic Empirical Study

Fateme Memar, Dongjie Wang, Arvin Agah · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28556 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Japanese

大型セレクト言語モデル(LLMs)は、テーブル機能選択のための概要統計に加えて、セマンティック機能名を活用することができるが、そのような情報が、確立された統計方法に比べてサブセット選択を改善する際は不明である。我々は、18データセットフレームワーク内で、グループ相対的政策最適化(GRPO)トレーニングのための10データセット、チェックポイント検証のための2データセット、クロスタスク比較のための6個の評価データセットを含むこの質問を調査する。我々は、5つのクラシックベースライン、凍結されたQwen2.5-7BおよびLlama-3.3-70B選択器、および2つのGRPOに適応したQwen2.5-7Bモデルを比較し、分類ROC-AUC

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can leverage semantic feature names alongside summary statistics for tabular feature selection, yet it remains unclear when such information improves subset selection relative to established statistical methods. We investigate this question within an 18-dataset framework comprising 10 datasets for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) training, 2 for checkpoint validation, and 6 held-out evaluation datasets. We compare five classical baselines, frozen Qwen2.5-7B and Llama-3.3-70B selectors, and two GRPO-adapted Qwen2.5-7B models, reporting classification ROC-AUC and regression R^2 separately and using dataset-wise ranks for cross-task comparison. Across five seeded evaluation partitions, classical selectors generally achieve higher predictive performance than the tested 7B LLM/RL selectors, including under a pre-specified ~33% feature budget with strict train-only classical fitting, while the 7B selectors retain compact subsets. A cardinality-matched semantic sensitivity experiment shows that, for Zero-shot Qwen-7B, informative feature names improve regression performance over anonymized and shuffled alternatives (+0.1964 and +0.1606 mean R^2), whereas aggregate classification differences are smaller (+0.0159 and +0.0084 ROC-AUC) and dataset-dependent. These results characterize when semantic information benefits LLM-based feature selection and show that classical selectors remain strong baselines for predictive tabular feature selection.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Feature selection, Leverage (statistics), Feature (linguistics), Computer science, Artificial intelligence, Regression

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange