Newest papers

BRIDGE: An Acceptance Gate to Block False Improvements in Model Updates, with a Retrospective Clinical Evaluation

Dwi Sunaryono · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29515 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Japanese

モデルは正確なデータを繰り返し更新し、更新が正確なデータでより良いように見えるが、新しいデータのリメイクは、臨床決定を誤導する可能性のある偽の改善である。無知の規則は、正確な検証の利益をすべて受け入れ、同じデータを選択し、更新を判断するときに楽観的である。 BRIDGEは、予測と利用可能なデータセットの各アップデートを決定するモデルアグノキシックの受け入れゲートである(A)(11セット)(B)合成タスク、(C)12回転臨床タスク、(D)39%オープンデータセットをサポートする偽の更新を判断し、選択偏見を減らすために、同様のデータを選択し、同様のデータを判断する必要があります。受け入れは、

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Models are updated repeatedly, and an update that looks better on validation data but not on new data is a false improvement that can misguide clinical decisions. The naive rule accepts every positive validation gain and is optimistic when the same data choose and judge the update. BRIDGE is a model-agnostic acceptance gate that decides each update from predictions and the available labels, with fixed settings. Each fold of the data judges the update chosen on the other folds (cross-fitting) to reduce selection bias; acceptance requires the gain's lower bootstrap bound to exceed a margin. The four settings are (A) 11 new datasets, (B) synthetic tasks, (C) 12 retrospective clinical tasks, and (D) 39 supporting datasets. The false-improvement rate falls from 19.1% (naive) to 1.1% (BRIDGE) in (A), 20.7% to 1.7% (B), 20.0% to 0% (C), and 12.5% to 0.5% (D); every 95% confidence interval of the reduction over datasets or tasks excludes zero (not over the clinical sources). An equal-size random draw from the naive acceptances contains more false improvements in (A)-(E) (post hoc, p<0.001). On the OpenML collection (E) of 14 new datasets, the false-improvement rate falls from 25.6% to 1.0%. BRIDGE removes 97% to 100% of the false improvements that the naive rule accepts, and its mean gain per deployed update is 1.8 to 3.1 times the naive rule's. The 95% upper bound on the false-improvement rate is below 5.5%: formal in (B) for independent tasks (3.56%), and conditional on the real data tested (0.33% to 5.40%).

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Block (permutation group theory), Data mining, Bridge (graph theory), Upper and lower bounds, Interval (graph theory)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.29515, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange