Newest papers

BRIDGE: An Acceptance Gate to Block False Improvements in Model Updates, with a Retrospective Clinical Evaluation

Dwi Sunaryono · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29515 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Chinese

模型是重复更新的数据,而更新看起来在验证数据上更好,但不是在新数据上是一个错误的改进,可以误导临床决策。天真的规则接受每一个正面验证收益,当相同的数据选择和评判更新时是乐观的。BRIDGE是一个模型-agnostic接受门户,决定每一个更新从预测和可用数据集,有固定的设置。数据的每一个折叠评估了在其他折叠(交叉配对)上选择的更新,以减少选择偏见的95%;接受要求收益的较低的bootstrap约束超过一个边界。 四个设置是(A)11个新的预测和可用数据集,(B)合成任务,(C)12个回顾临床任务,(D)39个支持

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Models are updated repeatedly, and an update that looks better on validation data but not on new data is a false improvement that can misguide clinical decisions. The naive rule accepts every positive validation gain and is optimistic when the same data choose and judge the update. BRIDGE is a model-agnostic acceptance gate that decides each update from predictions and the available labels, with fixed settings. Each fold of the data judges the update chosen on the other folds (cross-fitting) to reduce selection bias; acceptance requires the gain's lower bootstrap bound to exceed a margin. The four settings are (A) 11 new datasets, (B) synthetic tasks, (C) 12 retrospective clinical tasks, and (D) 39 supporting datasets. The false-improvement rate falls from 19.1% (naive) to 1.1% (BRIDGE) in (A), 20.7% to 1.7% (B), 20.0% to 0% (C), and 12.5% to 0.5% (D); every 95% confidence interval of the reduction over datasets or tasks excludes zero (not over the clinical sources). An equal-size random draw from the naive acceptances contains more false improvements in (A)-(E) (post hoc, p<0.001). On the OpenML collection (E) of 14 new datasets, the false-improvement rate falls from 25.6% to 1.0%. BRIDGE removes 97% to 100% of the false improvements that the naive rule accepts, and its mean gain per deployed update is 1.8 to 3.1 times the naive rule's. The 95% upper bound on the false-improvement rate is below 5.5%: formal in (B) for independent tasks (3.56%), and conditional on the real data tested (0.33% to 5.40%).

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Computer science, Block (permutation group theory), Data mining, Bridge (graph theory), Upper and lower bounds, Interval (graph theory)

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.29515, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange