Newest papers

Where Should a Stuck Agent Spend Its Next Tokens? Causal Attribution of Inference-Time Resources

Saiyue Lyu, Jerrold Huang, Yunbei Zhang, Janet Wang, Zhenting Wang, Yingqiang Ge, Haibo Zhang · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28834 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Portuguese

A escalação de tempo de inferência é muitas vezes tratada como um problema de orçamento de token, mas um agente de codificação falhado pode procurar recursos qualitativamente diferentes: computação, informação ou feedback. Introduzimos a Atribuição de Recursos Banzhaf (BRA), uma estrutura de fatores controlada que mede a contribuição marginal de cada recurso para reparar e suas interações, mantendo o estado falhado e o protocolo de revisão fixado. Avaliamos seis modelos em 194 falhas de nível de função de MBPP+ e HumanEval+ e 126 falhas de nível de repositório de SWE-bench Verified. Especificações relevantes para tarefas melhoram consistentemente a reparação, enquanto o feedback do teste público fornece pequenos ganhos e o código recuperado para pouco. O valor da computação

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Inference-time scaling is often treated as a token-budget problem, but a failed coding agent can seek qualitatively different resources: computation, information, or feedback. We introduce Banzhaf Resource Attribution (BRA), a controlled factorial framework that measures each resource's marginal contribution to repair and its interactions while holding the failed state and revision protocol fixed. We evaluate six models on 194 function-level failures from MBPP+ and HumanEval+ and 126 repository-level failures from SWE-bench Verified. Task-relevant specifications consistently improve repair, whereas public-test feedback provides small gains and retrieved code little to none. The value of additional computation declines with model capability, while information remains useful; resource channels largely exhibit diminishing returns, although complementary information can reinforce itself. Yet three of four frontier models select feedback in 95-100% of cases and obtain lower gains than uniform random resource selection. BRA thus exposes a gap between the resources agents prefer and those that measurably improve repair.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Attribution, Computer science, Coding (social sciences), Resource (disambiguation), Protocol (science), Marginal value

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.28834, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange