Newest papers

A Multimodal Engineering GraphRAG Framework for Post-Wind-Event Building Assessment and Recovery Inference

Seyedeh Fatemeh Mirfakhar, Reda Snaiki, Rocio L. Segura · 2026 · arXiv (Cornell University)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28216 · cited by 0 works (OpenAlex) · open-access PDF

Japanese

リサイクル・コンテキスト・アウトプローバーの基本的な評価は、観測されたフレームの物理的損傷を安全性、居住性、機能性、および回復への影響に結びつけることを必要とします。しかし、リサイクル・コンテキスト・アウトプローバーの証拠は、しばしば異質で、不完全で、画像や認識レポートに分散され、回復モデルは通常構造化されたエンジニアリング・インプットを必要とします。この研究は、リサイクル・コンテキスト・エンジニアリング・グラフ・アウトプローバー(GraphRAG)フレームワークを開発し、リサイクル・エンジニアリング・グラフ・アウトプローバー(GraphR

Machine translation (Meta M2M100); the English original follows.

Abstract

Post-event building assessment requires linking observed physical damage to its consequences for safety, habitability, functionality, and recovery. Yet post-disaster evidence is often heterogeneous, incomplete, and distributed across images and reconnaissance reports, while recovery models typically require structured engineering inputs. This study develops a multimodal engineering Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) framework that connects post-wind-event damage evidence to physical consequences, building-condition states, recovery actions, and downtime. Image- and text-based evidence is transformed into a provenance-preserving, component-level representation distinguishing confirmed damage, explicit negative evidence, unresolved conditions, and temporary measures. Graph-aligned retrieval combines comparable building scenarios with explicit engineering relationships, while compatibility, contradiction, evidence-precedence, and abstention mechanisms constrain inference under partial observability. Recovery actions are derived from supported damage-consequence relationships, and downtime uncertainty is propagated through an action-dependency network using Monte Carlo simulation. The framework is demonstrated for tornado-affected low-rise residential buildings using reconnaissance and image-based evidence. Comparisons with BaselineRAG and Structured Baseline RAG show improved agreement for key building-condition and recovery outcomes, together with traceable engineering reasoning and preserved evidence provenance. Ablation analyses demonstrate the contributions of engineering context, evidence safeguards, and graph-path traversal. The results support transparent, recovery-oriented assessment from incomplete multimodal post-event evidence.

Read in: English · Spanish · Chinese · Hindi · Arabic · Portuguese · French · German · Japanese · Russian · Korean · Indonesian · Vietnamese

Topics: Downtime, Inference, Computer science, Representation (politics), Baseline (sea), Artificial intelligence

Is this paper real? This page was built from OpenAlex and arXiv records, not generated. Software can verify any reference in one call: GET https://store.agentexchange.work/gw/papers/verify?title=...&year=... (0.003 USD), fetch this record as JSON with /gw/papers/paper?id=2610.28216, or list what it cites with /gw/papers/references?id=.... Pay per call in USDC (x402) or with a 19 USD card key for 1,000 calls. Catalogue · llms.txt

Sources: OpenAlex (CC0), arXiv, Crossref. Agent Exchange